<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .NET Obfuscators</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/</link>
	<description>C# Information, Code, Tips and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:13:45 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: timm</title>
		<link>http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/comment-page-1/#comment-5290</link>
		<dc:creator>timm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/#comment-5290</guid>
		<description>It comes down to how much you want to pay for your requirements.  

Some obfuscators are real crap.  At the very least, the obfuscator should crash .NET Reflector when you attempt to read the protected assembly.  CodeWall is a good choice at $399.  

But the best obfuscators will also foil in-memory attacks.  CodeVeil and CliSecure are examples, but both cost over $1200/seat.

If you are concerned about clients having the proper version of .NET installed, then you may want to convert from .NET to native code.  XenoCode PostBuild is an example at $1600/seat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It comes down to how much you want to pay for your requirements.  </p>
<p>Some obfuscators are real crap.  At the very least, the obfuscator should crash .NET Reflector when you attempt to read the protected assembly.  CodeWall is a good choice at $399.  </p>
<p>But the best obfuscators will also foil in-memory attacks.  CodeVeil and CliSecure are examples, but both cost over $1200/seat.</p>
<p>If you are concerned about clients having the proper version of .NET installed, then you may want to convert from .NET to native code.  XenoCode PostBuild is an example at $1600/seat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/comment-page-1/#comment-5288</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/#comment-5288</guid>
		<description>I have a .NET application that runs in conjunction with MS XP/Vista and Microsoft PowerPoint. I want to deploy the strongest code protection option available that will be fully compatible with Microsoft Office Applications to help avoid .NET support/compatibility issues, e.g. missing interop assemblies or .NET updates. Considering these and future compatibility issues which is a better solution:

- Code obfuscation for .NET - stick with .NET and make it more difficult to reverse engineer 

- Code conversion from .NET to native code. Could we deploy to platforms without .NET Framework or support Office for Mac using this approach?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a .NET application that runs in conjunction with MS XP/Vista and Microsoft PowerPoint. I want to deploy the strongest code protection option available that will be fully compatible with Microsoft Office Applications to help avoid .NET support/compatibility issues, e.g. missing interop assemblies or .NET updates. Considering these and future compatibility issues which is a better solution:</p>
<p>- Code obfuscation for .NET &#8211; stick with .NET and make it more difficult to reverse engineer </p>
<p>- Code conversion from .NET to native code. Could we deploy to platforms without .NET Framework or support Office for Mac using this approach?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timm</title>
		<link>http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/comment-page-1/#comment-3450</link>
		<dc:creator>timm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/#comment-3450</guid>
		<description>Updated, added Babel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Updated, added Babel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidew</title>
		<link>http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/comment-page-1/#comment-2883</link>
		<dc:creator>sidew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/#comment-2883</guid>
		<description>Please can you update the list of obfuscators adding Babel Obfuscator?

Name: Babel 
Company: Alberto Ferrazzoli
Price: Free

Address:
http://code.google.com/p/babelobfuscator/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please can you update the list of obfuscators adding Babel Obfuscator?</p>
<p>Name: Babel<br />
Company: Alberto Ferrazzoli<br />
Price: Free</p>
<p>Address:<br />
<a href="http://code.google.com/p/babelobfuscator/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/babelobfuscator/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidew</title>
		<link>http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/comment-page-1/#comment-2882</link>
		<dc:creator>sidew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/#comment-2882</guid>
		<description>I have done an obfuscator that you can download at:
It is free and it works well. Give it a try:

Its name is Babel and can be downloaded at:
http://code.google.com/p/babelobfuscator/

Features:
Type, Methods, Events, Properties, Fields name obfuscation.
MSIL control flow obfuscation
String encryption

It is based on new Microsoft Phoenix Technology see:
http://connect.microsoft.com/Phoenix

bye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have done an obfuscator that you can download at:<br />
It is free and it works well. Give it a try:</p>
<p>Its name is Babel and can be downloaded at:<br />
<a href="http://code.google.com/p/babelobfuscator/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/babelobfuscator/</a></p>
<p>Features:<br />
Type, Methods, Events, Properties, Fields name obfuscation.<br />
MSIL control flow obfuscation<br />
String encryption</p>
<p>It is based on new Microsoft Phoenix Technology see:<br />
<a href="http://connect.microsoft.com/Phoenix" rel="nofollow">http://connect.microsoft.com/Phoenix</a></p>
<p>bye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timm</title>
		<link>http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/comment-page-1/#comment-2082</link>
		<dc:creator>timm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/#comment-2082</guid>
		<description>Updated.  Thank you, everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Updated.  Thank you, everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xrt</title>
		<link>http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/comment-page-1/#comment-2041</link>
		<dc:creator>xrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/#comment-2041</guid>
		<description>Latest Phoenix Protector 1.4 is freeware now as well...
http://www.ntcore.com/phoenix.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Latest Phoenix Protector 1.4 is freeware now as well&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.ntcore.com/phoenix.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.ntcore.com/phoenix.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confluence: Utvikling</title>
		<link>http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/comment-page-1/#comment-1946</link>
		<dc:creator>Confluence: Utvikling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/#comment-1946</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Obfuscation...&lt;/strong&gt;

Hvorfor Obfuscation? Den koden du skriver for .NET ligger helt åpen for alle å se selv om den er i form av en dll eller exefil. Siden disse filene blir kompilert først i runtime av .......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Obfuscation&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Hvorfor Obfuscation? Den koden du skriver for .NET ligger helt åpen for alle å se selv om den er i form av en dll eller exefil. Siden disse filene blir kompilert først i runtime av &#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xrt</title>
		<link>http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/comment-page-1/#comment-1935</link>
		<dc:creator>xrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/#comment-1935</guid>
		<description>1)http://www.codeplex.com/SharpObfuscator
And also:
2)http://code.google.com/p/obfuscar/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1)http://www.codeplex.com/SharpObfuscator<br />
And also:<br />
2)http://code.google.com/p/obfuscar/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Codeplay</title>
		<link>http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/comment-page-1/#comment-1592</link>
		<dc:creator>Codeplay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharp411.com/net-obfuscators/#comment-1592</guid>
		<description>There is a review for CodeArmor product. It was done by Information Security

http://www.vilabs.com/docs/InformationSecurity_CodeArmor_Review.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a review for CodeArmor product. It was done by Information Security</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vilabs.com/docs/InformationSecurity_CodeArmor_Review.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.vilabs.com/docs/InformationSecurity_CodeArmor_Review.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
