<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grow Your Own SyncRoot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.csharp411.com/grow-your-own-syncroot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.csharp411.com/grow-your-own-syncroot/</link>
	<description>C# Information, Code, Tips and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:50:57 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock &#187; The Morning Brew #84</title>
		<link>http://www.csharp411.com/grow-your-own-syncroot/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock &#187; The Morning Brew #84</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharp411.com/grow-your-own-syncroot/#comment-368</guid>
		<description>[...] Grow Your Own SyncRoot  - An interesting article on locking - explaining why the SyncRoot property exists [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Grow Your Own SyncRoot  &#8211; An interesting article on locking &#8211; explaining why the SyncRoot property exists [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timm</title>
		<link>http://www.csharp411.com/grow-your-own-syncroot/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>timm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharp411.com/grow-your-own-syncroot/#comment-362</guid>
		<description>Yes, this is true with ArrayList, which specifically locks the SyncRoot for every method.  However, for more generalized classes that may have methods which can operate in &quot;read-only&quot; mode, it&#039;s better to not lock the entire object, which would eliminate the read-only capability.  But I understand the confusion from my article, so I updated it.  Thanks for your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this is true with ArrayList, which specifically locks the SyncRoot for every method.  However, for more generalized classes that may have methods which can operate in "read-only" mode, it's better to not lock the entire object, which would eliminate the read-only capability.  But I understand the confusion from my article, so I updated it.  Thanks for your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles</title>
		<link>http://www.csharp411.com/grow-your-own-syncroot/comment-page-1/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharp411.com/grow-your-own-syncroot/#comment-361</guid>
		<description>Your first point is completely meaningless!  From a concurrency access standpoint, there&#039;s no difference between locking the object and locking the SyncRoot.  

http://www.pcreview.co.uk/forums/thread-2616736.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your first point is completely meaningless!  From a concurrency access standpoint, there's no difference between locking the object and locking the SyncRoot.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcreview.co.uk/forums/thread-2616736.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcreview.co.uk/forums/thread-2616736.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
