Comments on: C# Empty Enumerator http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/ C# Information, Code, Tips and News Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:50:57 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: adam http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/comment-page-1/#comment-5305 adam Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:22:42 +0000 http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/#comment-5305 This is complete unnecessary. Just initialize your list to an empty list instead of null. kisS. Emphasis on that last S. This is complete unnecessary. Just initialize your list to an empty list instead of null. kisS. Emphasis on that last S.

]]> By: alwin http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/comment-page-1/#comment-1637 alwin Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:32:57 +0000 http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/#comment-1637 timm, you can include the System.Core dll in your own .net 2.0 install, see comment #12 on the page you gave a link for. Then you can build on .net 3.5, but you provide the needed libraries for ppl with only .net 2.0 timm, you can include the System.Core dll in your own .net 2.0 install, see comment #12 on the page you gave a link for. Then you can build on .net 3.5, but you provide the needed libraries for ppl with only .net 2.0

]]> By: Steve http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/comment-page-1/#comment-1624 Steve Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:35:54 +0000 http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/#comment-1624 Unless you need to instrument the enumerator, wouldn't private static readonly T[] empty = new T[]; and return empty.GetEnumerator(); be a simpler approach? Unless you need to instrument the enumerator, wouldn't

private static readonly T[] empty = new T[];

and

return empty.GetEnumerator();

be a simpler approach?

]]> By: Weekly Link Post 46 « Rhonda Tipton’s WebLog http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/comment-page-1/#comment-1542 Weekly Link Post 46 « Rhonda Tipton’s WebLog Sun, 15 Jun 2008 20:48:48 +0000 http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/#comment-1542 [...] Timm Martin talks in depth about the C# Empty Enumerator. [...] [...] Timm Martin talks in depth about the C# Empty Enumerator. [...]

]]> By: Jon Skeet http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/comment-page-1/#comment-1494 Jon Skeet Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:12:46 +0000 http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/#comment-1494 (That should be GetEmptyEnumerator() of course.) Jon (That should be GetEmptyEnumerator() of course.)

Jon

]]> By: Jon Skeet http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/comment-page-1/#comment-1493 Jon Skeet Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:11:42 +0000 http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/#comment-1493 Simpler implementation: public static IEnumerator GetEmptyEnumerator() { yield break; } Oh the joys of iterator blocks :) Jon Simpler implementation:

public static IEnumerator GetEmptyEnumerator()
{
yield break;
}

Oh the joys of iterator blocks :)

Jon

]]> By: Dew Drop – June 11, 2008 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/comment-page-1/#comment-1489 Dew Drop – June 11, 2008 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:35:37 +0000 http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/#comment-1489 [...] C# Empty Enumerator (Timm Webb) [...] [...] C# Empty Enumerator (Timm Webb) [...]

]]> By: Wilburysa http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/comment-page-1/#comment-1487 Wilburysa Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:11:56 +0000 http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/#comment-1487 The Good Theme Site What a great forum this and www.devtopics.com and excellent resource you have. The Good Theme Site

What a great forum this and http://www.devtopics.com and excellent resource you have.

]]> By: timm http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/comment-page-1/#comment-1483 timm Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:32:18 +0000 http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/#comment-1483 Because Enumerable.Empty<T>() is only available in System.Linq in .NET 3.5. Unfortunately, desktop commercial vendors such as myself are stuck with .NET 2.0 for the forseeable future. Here's why: http://www.devtopics.com/fat-net/ Because Enumerable.Empty() is only available in System.Linq in .NET 3.5. Unfortunately, desktop commercial vendors such as myself are stuck with .NET 2.0 for the forseeable future. Here's why:

http://www.devtopics.com/fat-net/

]]> By: Isaac Answers http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/comment-page-1/#comment-1481 Isaac Answers Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:58:49 +0000 http://www.csharp411.com/c-empty-enumerator/#comment-1481 Why Not To Use Enumerable.Empty() Generic Method? Why Not To Use Enumerable.Empty() Generic Method?

]]>